Newtonian mechanics is Kepler's Rule branded with Newtonian labels

1. I have my main proposition:

2. Newton uses Kepler's Rule to compute planetary orbits.

3. Kepler's Rule is not a dynamical rule. (A rule is a proportionality.)

4. Kepler's Rule does not have a term for force of attraction, or gravity.

5. Since we compute orbits of planets perfectly well with only Kepler's Rule we must conclude that orbits are kinematical not dynamical.

6. This is the only scientific and rational conclusion we can draw: If Kepler's Rule is kinematical, and if we compute orbits correctly with Kepler's Rule then orbits must be kinematical.

7. Newton's force of attraction, also known as "gravity", is defined as a divine miracle.

8. Miracles have no place in physics. Therefore, Newton could not have used this force to compute orbits. You cannot compute orbits with miracles.

9. And we open Newton's book and look at his calculations of orbits and ve see that indeed Newton does not use a force term in his calculations; he uses Kepler's Rule and he computes orbits by using the period T and radius R only.

10. Kepler's Rule has two terms R and T. But Newton and his disciples try to incorporate M for mass and F for force into Kepler's Rule to brand it as a Newtonian dynamical formula.

11. But this is a hoax because Newton and his disciples write their Newtonian dynamical terms and they repeat their sacred incantations to Newton and then they eliminate M's and F's and compute orbits with only T's and R's, that is, with Kepler's Rule.

12. This is the greatest scientific hoax in history.

13. All this is done to save Newton's sacred authority.

14. This is why we say that Newtonian mechanics is Kepler's Rule branded with Newtonian labels.